Ralph Day
6th March 2010, 14:33
Hi
A long time since I started a thread :o
I've found it difficult to charge my batteries (FLA) to the final full point of 1.265 SG reading on my "good"hydrometer...for a while now. Perhaps this is why...the hydrometer isn't so good?!
Today I purchased a refractometer at CarQuest of all places ($100+), and after zero-ing it the reading from my pilot cell was 1.270 while the hydrometer (bulb, float, tube etc) read 1.260. Sample from another cell also read .01 higher with the new optical refractometer. It only takes a drop of electrolyte to test so that's more fun than trying to read the graduated markings on a float inside a tube ....and so on.
So, trust the more expensive instrument? I'm inclined to, seeing as that last little SG number was so hard to get up to testing with the hydrometer.
Comments and suggestions? If you have experience with refractometers in an industrial or laboratory setting that would be great.
Thanks
Ralph
A long time since I started a thread :o
I've found it difficult to charge my batteries (FLA) to the final full point of 1.265 SG reading on my "good"hydrometer...for a while now. Perhaps this is why...the hydrometer isn't so good?!
Today I purchased a refractometer at CarQuest of all places ($100+), and after zero-ing it the reading from my pilot cell was 1.270 while the hydrometer (bulb, float, tube etc) read 1.260. Sample from another cell also read .01 higher with the new optical refractometer. It only takes a drop of electrolyte to test so that's more fun than trying to read the graduated markings on a float inside a tube ....and so on.
So, trust the more expensive instrument? I'm inclined to, seeing as that last little SG number was so hard to get up to testing with the hydrometer.
Comments and suggestions? If you have experience with refractometers in an industrial or laboratory setting that would be great.
Thanks
Ralph